Skip to content

The Treaty of Westphalia (1648)

The Treaty of Westphalia (1648) is one of the most significant peace agreements in European history, marking the end of the Thirty Years’ War and the Eighty Years’ War. This monumental accord not only brought an end to decades of conflict but also laid the foundations for modern state sovereignty and international law. In this article, we delve into the comprehensive details of the Treaty of Westphalia, its background, implications, and lasting legacy.

Historical Context of the Treaty of Westphalia

The Thirty Years’ War: A Prelude to Peace

The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) was a devastating conflict primarily fought within the Holy Roman Empire, involving many of the major European powers of the time. Initially a religious war between Protestant and Catholic states, it eventually evolved into a broader political struggle for power and territory. The immense loss of life and widespread destruction caused by the war made the need for a lasting peace agreement imperative.

The Eighty Years’ War: Dutch Independence

Concurrent with the Thirty Years’ War, the Eighty Years’ War (1568-1648) was a revolt of the Seventeen Provinces of what are now the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg against the Spanish Empire. The protracted conflict ultimately led to the recognition of Dutch independence through the Treaty of Westphalia.

Negotiations and Key Players

Peace Congresses of Westphalia

The Treaty of Westphalia was the result of prolonged negotiations held in the Westphalian cities of Münster and Osnabrück. These negotiations began in 1644 and involved representatives from virtually every European power, including the Holy Roman Empire, Spain, France, Sweden, the Dutch Republic, and numerous German principalities.

Prominent Diplomats and Leaders

Several notable figures played crucial roles in the negotiations. Cardinal Mazarin represented France, while Axel Oxenstierna and Johan Adler Salvius acted on behalf of Sweden. The Holy Roman Empire was represented by Count Maximilian von Trauttmansdorff, and the Dutch Republic sent Adriaan Pauw and Godert van Reede.

Key Provisions of the Treaty

Territorial Adjustments

One of the most significant outcomes of the Treaty of Westphalia was the extensive territorial adjustments it enacted. Sweden gained significant territories, including Western Pomerania, Wismar, and Bremen-Verden, strengthening its position as a major power in Northern Europe. France acquired Alsace, and the independence of the Dutch Republic was formally recognized, ending Spanish control over the region.

Religious Settlements

The treaty established important religious provisions, reinforcing the principles of the Peace of Augsburg (1555). It allowed the rulers of each state within the Holy Roman Empire to determine their official religion, whether Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinist, under the principle of “cuius regio, eius religio.” This effectively ended religiously motivated conflicts within the empire and acknowledged the legitimacy of Calvinism.

Sovereignty and Non-Interference

A groundbreaking aspect of the Treaty of Westphalia was its affirmation of state sovereignty. It established the precedent that no state should interfere in the internal affairs of another, a principle that became a cornerstone of international law. This concept of non-interference was crucial in shaping the future of European diplomacy and state relations.

Implications and Legacy

The Birth of Modern Diplomacy

The Treaty of Westphalia is often credited with heralding the birth of the modern diplomatic system. The principles of sovereignty and non-interference laid down by the treaty are fundamental to the Westphalian system of international relations, which continues to influence global politics today. The establishment of permanent diplomatic missions and the use of negotiation and dialogue to resolve conflicts can trace their roots back to this historic accord.

Impact on the Holy Roman Empire

The treaty significantly altered the political landscape of the Holy Roman Empire. It recognized the autonomy of the empire’s constituent states, weakening the power of the Emperor and leading to a more decentralized and fragmented political structure. This shift had long-lasting effects on the governance and stability of the empire.

Economic and Social Consequences

The end of the Thirty Years’ War and the Eighty Years’ War brought about significant economic and social changes. The cessation of hostilities allowed for the rebuilding of war-torn regions and the revival of trade and commerce. Additionally, the treaty’s provisions helped to reduce religious tensions, fostering a more stable and cohesive society.

Criticism and Controversy

Limitations of the Treaty

While the Treaty of Westphalia was groundbreaking in many respects, it was not without its limitations. Some critics argue that the treaty’s emphasis on state sovereignty and non-interference has contributed to the persistence of authoritarian regimes and the neglect of human rights. Additionally, the treaty did not address the root causes of many conflicts, leading to further wars and disputes in the following centuries.

Historical Interpretations

Historians have debated the true significance of the Treaty of Westphalia. Some view it as a turning point that paved the way for modern international relations, while others see it as a pragmatic solution to immediate problems rather than a visionary blueprint for the future. Regardless of these differing interpretations, the treaty’s impact on the development of the European state system is undeniable.

Conclusion

The Treaty of Westphalia (1648) stands as a landmark in the history of international diplomacy. By bringing an end to two of Europe’s most destructive conflicts and establishing principles that would shape the future of international relations, the treaty laid the groundwork for the modern state system. Its emphasis on sovereignty, non-interference, and religious tolerance continues to influence global politics and diplomacy to this day.

References:

  1.  Clodfelter, Micheal (2017). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015. McFarland. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-7864-7470-7.
  2. ^ “APW Einführung”. www.pax-westphalica.de. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  3. ^ “Peace of Westphalia | Definition, Map, Results, & Significance”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 6 August 2015. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  4. ^ Patton, Steven (2019). “The Peace of Westphalia and it Affects on International Relations, Diplomacy and Foreign Policy”. The Histories. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  5. ^ Osiander, Andreas (2001). “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth”. International Organization. 55 (2): 251–287. doi:10.1162/00208180151140577. JSTOR 3078632. S2CID 145407931. Archived from the original on 21 August 2021. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  6. ^ Elliott, J.H. (2009). Spain, Europe & the Wider World, 1500–1800. Yale University Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0300145373.
  7. ^ Croxton, Derek (2013). Westphalia: The Last Christian Peace. Palgrave. ISBN 978-1-137-33332-2. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilson, Peter H. (2009). Europe’s Tragedy: A History of the Thirty Years War. Allen Lane. p. 632. ISBN 978-0-7139-9592-3.
  9. ^ Lesaffer, Randall (23 July 2007). “Private Property in the Dutch-Spanish Peace Treaty of Münster (30 January 1648)”. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1002389. SSRN 1002389. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  10. ^ Konrad Repgen, ‘Negotiating the Peace of Westphalia: A Survey with an Examination of the Major Problems’, In: 1648: War and Peace in Europe: 3 vols. (Catalogue of the 26th exhibition of the Council of Europe, on the Peace of Westphalia), Klaus Bußmann and Heinz Schilling (eds.) on behalf of the Veranstaltungsgesellschaft 350 Jahre Westfälischer Friede, Münster and Osnabrück: no publ., 1998, ‘Essay Volume 1: Politics, Religion, Law and Society’, pp. 355–72, here pp. 355 seq.
  11. ^ Schiller, Frederick. “The Thirty Years War, Complete”.
  12. ^ Cobban, Helena (8 May 2021). “1648: Peace of Westphalia sets inter-state rules for >370 years”. Just World News. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  13. ^ Konrad Repgen, “Negotiating the Peace of Westphalia: A Survey with an Examination of the Major Problems”, In: 1648: War and Peace in Europe: 3 vols. (Catalogue of the 26th exhibition of the Council of Europe, on the Peace of Westphalia), Klaus Bußmann and Heinz Schilling (eds.) on behalf of the Veranstaltungsgesellschaft 350 Jahre Westfälischer Friede, Münster and Osnabrück: no publ., 1998, ‘Essay Volume 1: Politics, Religion, Law and Society’, pp. 355–372, here p. 356.
  14. ^ Sonnino, Paul (2009). Mazarin’s Quest: The Congress of Westphalia and the Coming of the Fronde. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04386-2. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  15. ^ “Digital modern German text Treaty of Münster”. lwl.org. 25 March 2014. Archived from the original on 25 March 2010. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  16. ^ Westfälischer Friede – Vertrag von Münster – Original German text Treaty of Münster digitised on German Wikisource
  17. ^ “Digital modern German text Treaty of Osnabrück”. lwl.org. 25 March 2014. Archived from the original on 31 January 2017. Retrieved 13 May 2017.
  18. ^ Westfälischer Friede – Vertrag von Osnabrück – Original German text Treaty of Osnabrück digitised on German Wikisource
  19. ^ Jump up to:a b Treaty of Münster 1648
  20. ^ Barro, R. J. & McCleary, R. M. “Which Countries have State Religions?” (PDF). University of Chicago. p. 5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 August 2006. Retrieved 7 November 2006.
  21. ^ “This day, Mary 15, in Jewish history”. Cleveland Jewish News. Archived from the original on 19 May 2014. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
  22. ^ The incipit of this brief, meaning “Zeal of the house of God”, quotes from Psalm 69:9: “For the zeal of thine house hath eaten me up, and the reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me.”
  23. ^ Larry Jay Diamond; Marc F. Plattner; Philip J. Costopoulo (2005). World religions and democracy. p. 103.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b “The Peace of Westphalia” (PDF). University of Oregon. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  25. ^ Mary Fulbrook A Concise History of Germany, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 60.
  26. ^ Böhme, Klaus-R (2001). “Die sicherheitspolitische Lage Schwedens nach dem Westfälischen Frieden”. In Hacker, Hans-Joachim (ed.). Der Westfälische Frieden von 1648: Wende in der Geschichte des Ostseeraums (in German). Kovač. p. 35. ISBN 3-8300-0500-8.
  27. ^ Böhme (2001), p. 36.
  28. ^ Böhme (2001), p. 37.
  29. ^ Jump up to:a b c Böhme (2001), p. 38.
  30. ^ Whaley, Joachim (24 November 2011), “Germany and the Holy Roman Empire in 1500”, Germany and the Holy Roman Empire Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia, 1493–1648, Oxford University Press, pp. 623–624, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198731016.003.0002, ISBN 978-0-19-873101-6, archived from the original on 16 January 2023, retrieved 28 April 2022
  31. ^ Gross, Leo (1948). “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948”. American Journal of International Law. 42 (1): 20–41 [p. 25]. doi:10.2307/2193560. JSTOR 2193560. S2CID 246010450.
  32. ^ Henry Kissinger (2014). “Introduction and Chapter 1”. World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-241-00426-5.
  33. ^ Osiander, Andreas (2001). “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth”. International Organization. 55 (2): 251–287. doi:10.1162/00208180151140577. ISSN 1531-5088. S2CID 145407931.
  34. ^ Randall Lesaffer (2014). “Peace treaties from Lodi to Westphalia”. Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-511-21603-9.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *