The Shah dynasty of Nepal were rulers from the mid-18th century until 2008. The dynasty originates from the Gorkha Kingdom in Nepal .The Shah Dynasty traces its roots to Mukunda Sen, founded by Gulshar Thapa Prithvi Narayan Shah of small principality of Gorkha who attacked and conquered several smaller principalities Known as Baise Rajya (22 states) including Kaski,Pokhara.
Table of Contents
The Shah Dynasty outlined the political boundaries of Nepal, besides etching out the social, cultural, and religious life of the people. Till most of their rule, despite all the internal strife, foreign interference, and questionings of their authority, the Shah rulers greatly managed to hold the power of the kingdom. As a matter of fact, with the coming of the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly with the rise of the Rana oligarchy, their powers of governance were highly minimized.
In 1951, Shahs finally managed to recapture power after many years of struggling. By this time, however, the call for democracy was getting louder. The monarchy continued in a constitutional form until the eventual abolition of the monarchy in 2008. This paper looks at the history, influence, and eventual fall of the Shah dynasty, identifying main events and figures involved in the process.
Prithvi Narayan Shah and the Unification of Nepal
Prithvi Narayan Shah was born in 1723 and became the first monarch of the unified kingdom of Nepal. He was the ninth ruler of this small hill principality of Gorkha that lay to the northwest of the Kathmandu Valley. The young prince had a vision of a unified Nepal beyond Gorkha; he viewed the small, fragmented kingdoms of the region as lacking the security against foreign invasion and needing unification into one powerful state. He was particularly suspicious of British imperial expansion in India and wished to create a buffer by uniting Nepal under a strong central government.
At the center of Prithvi Narayan Shah’s focus was the Kathmandu Valley, where three powerful kingdoms reigned: Kathmandu, Bhaktapur, and Patan. These kingdoms had enjoyed a high level of influence both economically and politically. In the 1740s, Prithvi Narayan Shah initiated military campaigns against a number of smaller kingdoms surrounding the valley. His most famous victory was in 1768 when his forces captured Kathmandu, thus ending the rule of the Malla dynasty and firmly establishing the Shah dynasty as the ruling power in the region 2.
Prithvi Narayan Shah’s policies were not only military but also one of diplomacy. He allied with neighboring states, improved administrative efficiency, and encouraged trade. One of the most important reforms he regulated was regarding nationalism and self-dependency. He closed Nepal’s borders to foreign influences, most especially to the British East India Company, and adopted a policy of isolationism, which he felt would help preserve Nepal’s sovereignty. He called Nepal a “yam between two boulders,” gesturing with awareness to the precarious geopolitical position of Nepal amidst the expanding British Empire to the south and the Qing Dynasty of China to the north.
Prithvi Narayan Shah unified Nepal, thereby laying the bedrock of the modern Nepalese state. In furtherance of his vision of a strong and united Nepal, the task begun by him was continued by his successors; however, this dynasty faced a host of challenges in keeping up the unity and stability that Prithvi Narayan Shah had achieved for the nation. He is still remembered in present-day Nepal and is often referred to as the “Father of the Nation.”
Shah Successors and Consolidation of Power
After Prithvi Narayan Shah’s death in 1775, his successors consolidated the gains he had made. His immediate successor, Pratap Singh Shah, ruled for a brief period, and upon his death, the throne passed to his young son, Rana Bahadur Shah. In reality, however, at this time the Shah dynasty saw further consolidation of its power under the regency of Rana Bahadur Shah’s mother, Queen Rajendra Laxmi.
Queen Rajendra Laxmi played an important role in the maintenance of unity inside the newly born kingdom. She followed the expansionist policies of her father-in-law Prithvi Narayan Shah and advanced the frontiers of Nepal westward and eastward. This period was also characterized by internecine conflict, with different groups inside the palace tugging in various directions. The young king, Rana Bahadur Shah, himself became a controversial figure for his erratic behavior and scandalous personal life, which eventually led to his abdication and exile in 1799(5).
In 1806, following the assassination of Rana Bahadur Shah, a military commander by the name Bhimsen Thapa rose to prominence as Mukhtiyar, or chief executive, of Nepal. Although Shah kings remained nominal rulers, the actual holder of power was Bhimsen Thapa, who ruled the Nepali government for the following 31 years. He introduced serious military and administrative reforms, but his reign was marred by hostilities with British India. The latter prevailed in the course of the Anglo-Nepalese War (1814–1816); it ended with the signing of the Sugauli Treaty, which obliged Nepal to give away much of its territory to the British .
But despite these setbacks, the Shah dynasty remained in power, though increasingly challenged by internal factions and the growing power of the Rana family, which would eventually take control of the government in the mid-19th century.
The Rana Oligarchy and the Marginalization of the Shah Kings
The rise to power of the Rana family in the mid-19th century is very important turning point in Shah dynasty history. Thus, the Kot Massacre of 1846 became an important milestone that led to the establishment of the Rana oligarchy. The massacre was engineered by Jung Bahadur Rana in which all the ranking nobles died and consolidated the position of Jung Bahadur as a de facto ruler of Nepal. He announced himself Prime Minister and established a hereditary system in which the post of Prime Minister was passed around the Rana family. The Shah kings were relegated to mere figureheads and had very little political power.
The monarchy remained intact during the Rana regime from 1846 to 1951, but in running the country, the Shah kings were badly sidelined. The Ranas did not permit the Shah kings to exercise more than mere ceremonial functions and exercised rigid control over both the military and the administration. Still, the Shah Dynasty continued to serve as a symbol of national unity while the monarchy remained culturally and religiously vital in the eyes of the Nepalese people 8.
The Rana period was marked by significant social and economic changes. While the Ranas thus modernized the military and infrastructure, they also maintained a policy of isolation from the outside world, much as did the policies of Prithvi Narayan Shah. It was closed to foreign influence, and the Ranas kept on good terms with the British colonial government in India, a position that allowed them to continue their rule without interference.
By the mid-20th century, however, the Rana regime was facing heightened opposition internally and externally. The rise of democratic movements throughout Asia, bolstered by the collapse of colonialism, nurtured demands for political reform in Nepal. Shah kings, relegated to the sidelines for over a century, began to reassert their authority, and the stage was set for the eventual defeat of the Rana regime.
Demise of Shah Monarchy and Rise of Democracy
The political scenario changed swiftly in the 20th century over Nepal, from the restoration of the Shah monarchy to the ultimate abolishment of the monarchy as a whole. In 1950, King Tribhuvan from the Shah dynasty fled to India and took refuge there, aligning himself with the pro-democratic elements of the people against the Rana regime. This led to the revolution of 1951, which saw the Rana rule end and the Shah kings restored to power .
The arrival of King Tribhuvan back to Nepal heralded a new era in Nepal’s political history. While restoration of monarchy took place, yet politics in Nepal could never go back to the pre-1950 days as politics had gathered its momentum. King Mahendra introduced a new constitution providing for a parliamentary system of government. However, he soon dissolved the parliament and imposed direct royal rule on grounds of political instability.
This was the era of direct rule by the Shah kings until 1990, when a mass pro-democracy movement forced King Birendra-who had succeeded Mahendra-to yield to constitutional reforms. Further, Nepal achieved a state of constitutional monarchy in which the king retained only a nominal and purely honorary head of state, while the right to exercise political power was vested on an elected parliament. However, the monarchy continued to be in turmoil-mostly by Maoist insurgents who consequently wished to make Nepal a republic .
The 2001 royal massacre that shook Nepal sent King Birendra and most of his immediate family to their deaths under mysterious circumstances. Then, his brother Gyanendra took the throne but was besieged with political turmoil and growing unrest. Gyanendra’s attempt to impose direct rule in 2005 boomeranged into widespread protests that resulted in the eventual abolition of the monarchy in 2008. Nepal was declared a federal democratic republic thus bringing an end to over two centuries of Shah rule 13.
The Shah dynasty thus remains a matter of debate in contemporary Nepal. While the monarchy is no longer a political institution, Shah kings are remembered for their roles in shaping Nepal’s history and unifying the country. The contributions of Prithvi Narayan Shah and his successors remain a source of national pride as Nepal moves forward as a republic.
Conclusion
The Shah dynasty lay at the heart of modern Nepal’s formation, from the unification efforts of Prithvi Narayan Shah in the 18th century to the eventual abolition of the monarchy in the 21st century, the Shah rulers influenced the political, social, and cultural development of Nepal. The Shah kings thus played an important role in terms of being a symbol of national identity, despite the challenge to their power through the rise of the Rana oligarchy and later the democratic movements during much of the history of Nepal. Today, as Nepal continues its journey as a democratic republic, the legacy of the Shah Dynasty remains one of the biggest parts of the country’s historical narrative.
References
- Stiller, L. F. The Rise of the House of Gorkha. Human Resource Development Research Center, 1973.
- Whelpton, J. A History of Nepal. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- Acharya, B. Prithvi Narayan Shah: The Founder of Modern Nepal. Himalaya Publishing House, 2008.
- Karmacharya, B. S. Queen Regent Rajendra Laxmi: Her Contributions to Nepalese History. Nepal Academy, 1983.
- Whelpton, J. Kings, Soldiers, and Priests: Nepalese Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
- Muni, S. D. Anglo-Nepalese Relations: 1816–1947. South Asia Publishers, 1993
- Sharma, S. Jung Bahadur Rana: A Political Biography. Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1973.
- Joshi, B. L. Nepal: Problems of Governance. Konark Publishers, 2004.
- Onta, P. Nepal and the Rana Rule: The Isolation and Modernization Dichotomy. Himal Books, 1996.
- Koirala, B. P. Nepal’s Struggle for Democracy. Orient Longman, 1955.
- Hoftun, M., Raeper, W. Spring Awakening: An Account of the 1990 Revolution in Nepal. Penguin Books, 1990.
- Thapa, D. The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal: Revolution in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, 2003.
- Gellner, D. The Abolition of the Monarchy in Nepal. Sage Publications, 2008.